I is weak because it confuses economy, nationality, etc. II is strong because it clearly categories terrorism and suggests the remedy accordingly.
Argument II describes the negative aspect of the vernacular medium. Hence II is strong.
Since availability of LPG is necessary, I is strong. Again, it is not adaptable to our existing type of engines, Hence II is also strong.
I do not go into reasons of hike of transportation changes. Hence I is weak. II is strong because there will be a great effect on the budgets of the parents.
I does not point out the reasons of impairment . But II is strong because an important part of economic activity can't be ignored.
I shows the benefits of rooftop rainwater harvesting: hence I is strong. II is strong as it talks of the necessity.
Argument I is too simplistic. Hence I is not strong but II is because it pinpoints the positive feature.
Arguments I is strong because it pinpoints the negative feature of an illiterate bus driver . II is not strong because mechanical skill is not enough. Traffic rules are also important.
I is strong because it focusses on the problems caused by bullock carts.
if neither I nor II is strong; and
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.