All are strong, mercy death will serve as a liberation to those to whom living is more difficult and painful. Also, it becomes our moral duty to encourage such people to live their lives to the fullest and support them through the crisis and not demoralise them by allowing them to die, if they wish to.
I and III are strong. In present times,women are being imparted education at par with the men and are capable of competing with them in all professional fields. Hence, I is strong. Also, present day women are well looking to outside jobs together with the household work. Hence, III is also strong but II is not strong.
The statement which strengthens is, the employees who use gymnasium facilities are fit.
Obviously, the opposite statement weakens,'Not all these employees who use gymnasium are fit.'
This options says that aggressiveness is common way for both.
The statement (d) strengthen the statement more accurately as it talks about the rate of private nursing homes and prolonged hospitalisation of elderly.
Argument I is weak because talking of culture is irrelevant in this case. Infact, Argument I is not even true. Argument II is weak because it is simplistic. We are not told what these unhealthy practices' will be. Argument III is weak because it is superfluous.
Argument I is a weak because it is not true. Look at the alternative given in II. Argument II is also not strong because instead of getting in to the reason, it provided an alternative. Argument III is simplistic and hence weak, it is argument by example.
Only Argument II is strong, Argument I and III are weak as 'All' cannot be punished of the fault of 'many'.
None of the arguments has strong reasons to support or to oppose the given statements. So, none of the argument is strong.
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.