Neither I nor II follow. Marriage functions could not be banned. Also, it is the duty of hospitals to provide best services and Government advice is not required.
The Government should set up an expert group to inspect the condition of school buses to avoid such accidents while II is impractical.
The failure of majority of students hints at there being some lack on the part of the teaching faculty, which needs to be removed by constant efforts. So, none of the given courses of action follows.
Only Course of action I follows as CBI should try to catch the officer red-handed and then take a strict action against him.
Only III logically follows because such accidents should not be repeated. The railways authorities should be asked to man all its level crossings.
I and II Courses of action logically follow because it is necessary for police to investigate into the causes and to avoid the recurrence of such situation, police should take adequate precautions.
All courses of action logically follow. First of all, the water of ponds should be treated to identify the nature of the virus. Since the problem is being faced, so the catching of then shrimps from the ponds should be temporarily stopped. Also, the fisherman should be asked to watch for the onset of such phenomenon in nature.
If the Government is not ready with the action plan for disaster management, then it is not possible to remove distress, hence Course of action I is appropriate. If the Government permits development activities which are likely to cause harm to nature, then natural calamities will increase, hence, II follow. If the Government appoints a committee of environmentalists and scientists and takes action accordingly, then it will be beneficial. hence, Course of action III is appropriate.
It is necessary for the Government to follow stringent norms for granting permission to the management institutes. For the students too, it is necessary to examine the market value of the degree while talking admissions. But courses of action III is not related to the statement. Hence, Courses of action I and II are appropriate.
Courses of action I follow because on examining the examination system, the defects of the education can be removed. Courses of action II also follows because the system of education should be so designed as to discourage the rote learning. But Courses of action III does not follows because it is of no use.
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.