Data Sufficiency – Linear arrangement of five buildings (find the middle) Question: In a row of five buildings P, Q, R, S and T, which building is exactly in the middle? Statements: I. Buildings S and Q are at the two extreme ends of the row. II. Building T is to the right of building R.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is sufficient

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This is a DS problem on linear arrangements. We must determine if the given constraints uniquely identify the building in the central (3rd) position of a row of five distinct buildings.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Buildings: P, Q, R, S, T arranged left-to-right in a straight row.
  • Exactly five positions; no duplicates.
  • Middle means the 3rd position from the left.


Concept / Approach:
Check each statement's implications separately, then together. If more than one valid lineup satisfies the statements but yields different middles, the information is insufficient.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Using I alone: S and Q occupy the two ends (order unknown). The middle could be P or R or T. Multiple possibilities ⇒ not sufficient.Using II alone: T is somewhere to the right of R (not necessarily adjacent). Without fixed end positions, the middle varies widely ⇒ not sufficient.Using I and II together: The ends are S and Q. The remaining middle three positions are some permutation of P, R, T with the constraint R left of T. Examples: (1) S R P T Q → middle is P; (2) S P R T Q → middle is R. Both satisfy I and II but give different middles. Therefore, even together the statements are not sufficient.


Verification / Alternative check:
Systematically enumerate permutations of the three middle buildings under R–left–of–T and confirm that the 3rd position changes across valid arrangements.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • I alone / II alone / Both: none of these fix a unique middle building; multiple solutions persist.
  • Either I or II: false because neither alone suffices.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming 'to the right' means 'immediately to the right'. It does not; without adjacency, many orders remain possible.


Final Answer:
Neither I nor II is sufficient

More Questions from Data Sufficiency

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion