Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is sufficient
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:This is a DS problem on linear arrangements. We must determine if the given constraints uniquely identify the building in the central (3rd) position of a row of five distinct buildings.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Check each statement's implications separately, then together. If more than one valid lineup satisfies the statements but yields different middles, the information is insufficient.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Using I alone: S and Q occupy the two ends (order unknown). The middle could be P or R or T. Multiple possibilities ⇒ not sufficient.Using II alone: T is somewhere to the right of R (not necessarily adjacent). Without fixed end positions, the middle varies widely ⇒ not sufficient.Using I and II together: The ends are S and Q. The remaining middle three positions are some permutation of P, R, T with the constraint R left of T. Examples: (1) S R P T Q → middle is P; (2) S P R T Q → middle is R. Both satisfy I and II but give different middles. Therefore, even together the statements are not sufficient.Verification / Alternative check:Systematically enumerate permutations of the three middle buildings under R–left–of–T and confirm that the 3rd position changes across valid arrangements.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Assuming 'to the right' means 'immediately to the right'. It does not; without adjacency, many orders remain possible.
Final Answer:Neither I nor II is sufficient
Discussion & Comments