Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: validation
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Verification and validation are complementary quality activities. Verification asks “Did we build the product right?” (conformance to specification), while validation asks “Did we build the right product?” (fitness for intended use). Evaluating behavior in simulated and live contexts aligns with validation because it tests the solution under realistic user workflows and operating conditions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Validation activities include usability testing, user acceptance testing, pilot rollouts, and production shadowing/parallel runs. By exercising the software where and how it will be used, validation provides evidence that workflows, data volumes, and constraints are handled correctly for users and stakeholders.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Map simulated/live testing to the V&V framework.Recognize that end-user context and real workloads are the focus.Identify the correct term: validation.
Verification / Alternative check:
Unit and functional tests (verification) can pass while users still reject the product because it fails real tasks. Testing in realistic contexts (validation) closes that gap, confirming the product is the right fit.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Checking” is vague; “usability” is a sub-aspect, not the whole activity; “validity” is a general noun, not the established software QA term. “None of the above” is wrong because “validation” precisely fits.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing verification with validation; restricting testing to lab conditions only and discovering issues post go-live. Always include representative user journeys.
Final Answer:
validation
Discussion & Comments