Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: They reflect opportunity costs, including both explicit and implicit costs of using resources
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Economists and accountants use the term cost in different ways. For decision making in production and pricing, economics focuses on opportunity cost, which includes not only direct money payments but also the value of alternatives given up. Accounting costs, in contrast, usually record explicit monetary expenditures based on invoices and receipts. This question asks how production costs are viewed by an economist.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Economic cost of production is broader than accounting cost. It includes explicit costs, which involve direct monetary payments to outside suppliers, and implicit costs, which are the imputed values of owner supplied resources and other foregone opportunities. For example, if an entrepreneur uses personal savings in the business, the implicit cost includes interest that could have been earned elsewhere. Economists incorporate both types of cost when analysing firm decisions about output and pricing. Therefore, production costs to an economist are best described as reflecting opportunity costs of all resources used.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative that is sacrificed when a resource is used for a particular purpose.Step 2: Identify explicit costs such as wages, rent, raw material payments, and interest paid to lenders, which appear in accounting books.Step 3: Identify implicit costs such as the value of the owner own labour, the normal return on owner capital, and income that could have been earned in another job.Step 4: Recognise that economic cost includes both explicit and implicit costs, because both represent sacrifices of alternatives.Step 5: Compare the options and select the one that mentions opportunity costs and includes both explicit and implicit components.
Verification / Alternative check:
Microeconomics texts define economic cost as the payment that must be made to obtain and retain the services of a resource in a particular use. This includes both payments to outsiders and the income that the firm must provide to its own resources to keep them in the business. When calculating economic profit, economists subtract both explicit and implicit costs from revenue. Accounting profit, on the other hand, usually subtracts only explicit costs. This distinction confirms that economists consider opportunity cost while accountants focus mainly on historical money outlays.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option b is incomplete because it restricts cost to explicit money payments and ignores implicit costs. Options c and d misstate the role of money outlays, either excluding foregone alternatives or excluding monetary costs altogether, which is not how economists define cost. Option e suggests that economic costs are based only on historical records, but economics is forward looking and uses opportunity cost concepts rather than relying solely on past accounting data.
Common Pitfalls:
Students often equate cost with the figures shown in the profit and loss statement and forget that economics uses a wider concept. This can lead to confusion when explaining why a firm may shut down even when accounting profit is positive, because economic profit could be negative once implicit costs are included. To avoid this misunderstanding, it is helpful to always associate economic cost with opportunity cost and recognise that both explicit and implicit costs must be considered.
Final Answer:
To an economist, production costs reflect opportunity costs and therefore include both explicit money payments and implicit costs of using resources.
Discussion & Comments