Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: The time it takes for the mass of the process to respond to an input change
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When a controller changes its output, the process typically does not respond instantly. Physical inertia, capacitance, thermal mass, and transport delays create a lag between the applied input and the observed change in the process variable. Distinguishing process lag from sensor lag or control-signal delays is essential for correct tuning and diagnostics.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Process lag refers to the plant’s internal energy storage and transport effects. The controller output (MV) changes, but the process variable (PV) responds after a characteristic delay and rise shaped by time constants and dead times. Proper models (e.g., first-order-plus-dead-time) separate these effects from sensor or actuator dynamics to guide tuning (e.g., PID parameters).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the locus of delay: inside the process volume or mechanism.Differentiate from sensor response time (measurement lag) and setpoint tracking artifacts (controller behavior).Choose the option describing mass/inertia-based delay of the process itself.
Verification / Alternative check:
Step tests on the plant with fast sensors show the PV’s inherent lag even when measurement delay is negligible, confirming the process-origin nature of the lag.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A: Sensor lag is measurement-related, not process lag. B: Error-signal lag can arise from controller design; it is not the plant’s physical lag. D: Not all statements are correct for process lag.
Common Pitfalls:
Over-tuning integral action to “fight” lag that is actually plant inertia, causing oscillations.
Final Answer:
The time it takes for the mass of the process to respond to an input change.
Discussion & Comments