Statement–Argument — Should firms prioritize acquiring new clients? Arguments: I) Yes; new clients expand the revenue base and future growth opportunities. II) No; focusing on acquisition can degrade service to existing clients. Choose the strong argument(s).

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: If either I or II is strong.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Customer-portfolio strategy balances acquisition and retention. Over-indexing on either dimension can harm long-run value.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Acquisition feeds pipeline growth and diversification.
  • Retention preserves lifetime value and referrals.
  • Resources (sales, support) are limited and must be allocated.


Concept / Approach:
Argument I is strong: growth often requires new accounts. Argument II is also strong: neglecting current clients can trigger churn and reputational damage. Each is independently persuasive; the optimal strategy is a balanced funnel with service SLAs.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) I: revenue scaling rationale → strong.2) II: retention/service quality rationale → strong.3) Mark “either.”


Verification / Alternative check:
Firms often set separate teams/targets for “land” and “expand,” reflecting both arguments’ validity.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Only I/Only II” ignores the countervailing imperative; “Neither” denies basic business truths.


Common Pitfalls:
Chasing growth while underfunding post-sale success management.


Final Answer:
If either I or II is strong.

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion