Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Does not apply — a pointer is a reference/locator, not a coding scheme
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Pointers appear in file systems, hierarchical/network databases, indexes, and internal DBMS structures. They link one record, page, or node to another. Clarifying this term avoids confusion with “codes,” which are standardized value sets used to represent business attributes.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A pointer is metadata about where to find something, not what that something means. In DBMS internals, leaf nodes of B-tree indexes, heap row links, or overflow chains all use pointers to navigate storage structures efficiently.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify what a pointer stores: a location or identifier of a target.Compare to a code, which stores a semantic category (e.g., “US” for country).Note that pointers enable navigation; codes enable interpretation of business meaning.Therefore, equating pointers with coding schemes is incorrect.
Verification / Alternative check:
Inspect DBMS documentation for row identifiers (RID/rowid/OID): each is defined as a locator, not a business code. Likewise, file systems use inode pointers to point to blocks, not to describe the data’s meaning.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option b contradicts standard definitions. Option c restricts pointers to hierarchical systems; modern RDBMS also use them internally. Option d mixes normalization with storage references. Option e confuses pointers with cryptographic keys.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing surrogate keys or OIDs with business codes; assuming pointers persist across reorganizations without indirection; mistaking logical foreign keys (values) for physical pointers (locators).
Final Answer:
Does not apply — a pointer is a reference/locator, not a coding scheme
Discussion & Comments