Entity–Relationship (ER) diagram notation In classic Chen-style ER modeling, what does an oval (ellipse) symbol represent in an ER diagram?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Attribute

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Entity–Relationship (ER) diagrams are a foundational tool in data modeling. They use a small set of shapes to communicate the structure of data: rectangles, diamonds, and ovals. Understanding what each symbol means is essential when you interpret models, communicate with stakeholders, or transform a conceptual design into a relational schema.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The question references classic ER notation (often called Chen notation).
  • Common symbols: rectangle for entity, diamond for relationship, oval for attribute.
  • We are not using crow’s foot or UML class diagram notation here.


Concept / Approach:

In Chen notation, an attribute is a descriptive property of an entity or relationship. Attributes are drawn as ovals connected to the entity or relationship they describe. Key attributes may be underlined; multivalued attributes can be shown as double ovals; derived attributes are sometimes shown dashed. This visual vocabulary allows quick reading of model semantics before any database technology is chosen.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the oval symbol in the ERD legend or example.Recall that rectangles represent entities (things of interest).Recall that diamonds represent relationships (associations between entities).Map the remaining shape, the oval, to attributes (properties).Therefore, an oval corresponds to an attribute in Chen ER notation.


Verification / Alternative check:

Compare multiple ERD references or textbooks: they consistently show ovals for attributes in Chen notation. Other notations, such as crow’s foot, embed attributes inside entity boxes but Chen uses external ovals, reinforcing this mapping.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Entity: rendered as a rectangle, not an oval.
  • Optional participation: shown by cardinality/participation markers, not by ovals.
  • Relationship: rendered as a diamond, not an oval.
  • Primary key constraint: indicated by underlining the attribute name, not by a special oval shape.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Mixing notations: crow’s foot places attributes in boxes; Chen places them in ovals.
  • Confusing derived or multivalued attribute conventions; those are variants of the oval but still indicate attributes.


Final Answer:

Attribute

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion