An army lost 10% of its men in war. Then 10% of the remaining men died due to disease, and then 10% of the rest were declared disabled. After these three successive reductions, the army was left with 7,29,000 active men. What was the original strength of the army?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 1,000,000

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This problem tests successive percentage reduction. When percentages are applied one after another, you multiply the remaining fractions, not subtract the percentages directly from the original. Here, three separate 10% reductions happen sequentially.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • First reduction: 10% lost in war (remaining 90%).
  • Second reduction: 10% of remaining died (remaining 90% of the remainder).
  • Third reduction: 10% of the rest disabled (remaining 90% again).
  • Final active men = 729,000.


Concept / Approach:
Each 10% reduction means multiply by 0.9. After three steps, final = original * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 = original * 0.9^3. Solve original = final / 0.9^3.


Step-by-Step Solution:

After first reduction: remaining = 0.9 * original. After second reduction: remaining = 0.9 * (0.9 * original) = 0.9^2 * original. After third reduction: remaining = 0.9 * (0.9^2 * original) = 0.9^3 * original. Compute 0.9^3 = 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 = 0.729. Given final active men: 0.729 * original = 729,000. So original = 729,000 / 0.729. Since 0.729 = 729/1000, original = 729,000 * (1000/729) = 1,000,000.


Verification / Alternative check:
If original is 1,000,000: after first 10% loss remaining 900,000; after next 10% remaining 810,000; after next 10% remaining 729,000, matching the final count.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

1,100,000 and 1,200,000 are too large and would produce final counts above 729,000. 900,000 is too small and would produce final counts below 729,000. 1,500,000 is far too large; it ignores the multiplicative nature of successive reductions.


Common Pitfalls:
Subtracting 30% from the original directly (incorrect), or applying 10% each time to the original rather than to the remaining strength.


Final Answer:
1,000,000

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion