The question below consists of a set of three labelled sentence fragments A, B, and C; from the options given, choose the most logical order to form one coherent sentence: I learnt he had A spoke about yoga, slums, and Indian B never been to India, yet he C cinema with conviction.

Introduction / Context:
This question tests your ability to arrange labelled sentence fragments into a grammatically correct and logically coherent sentence. Such para jumbles or jumbled sentence questions are common in English comprehension sections because they check both grammar awareness and understanding of meaning and flow.

Given Data / Assumptions:
The base frame of the sentence is I learnt he had followed by three fragments: A spoke about yoga, slums, and Indian, B never been to India, yet he, and C cinema with conviction. The final sentence must describe a surprising fact that he had never visited India but still spoke confidently about Indian topics.

Concept / Approach:
You should first look for a fragment that can directly follow he had, because that is a helping verb that needs a past participle. Fragment B begins with never been, which is the past participle phrase that naturally follows he had. After that, the conjunction yet introduces contrast and is followed by a clause showing a surprising ability. That clause is formed by fragment A spoke about yoga, slums, and Indian and then rounded off by fragment C cinema with conviction, which completes the object phrase Indian cinema.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Attach he had to a suitable past participle phrase. The only fragment that fits is B never been to India, yet he.Step 2: Note that yet he at the end of B requires a finite verb to show what he did despite never visiting India.Step 3: Choose fragment A spoke about yoga, slums, and Indian as the verb clause that matches yet he.Step 4: Observe that Indian needs a noun to complete the phrase, which is supplied by fragment C cinema with conviction.Step 5: Combine them in the order B A C to get the complete sentence I learnt he had never been to India, yet he spoke about yoga, slums, and Indian cinema with conviction.

Verification / Alternative check:
If you try any other order, the grammar or meaning breaks. For example, A C B after I learnt he had gives I learnt he had spoke about yoga, slums, and Indian cinema with conviction never been to India, yet he, which is ungrammatical and illogical. The order B A C alone satisfies correct verb form had never been, a clear contrast with yet, and a meaningful object Indian cinema.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
ACB, ABC, CBA, and CAB all fail either grammatically or logically. Some orders put spoke directly after had without the necessary past participle form. Others separate Indian from cinema so that the phrase Indian cinema never completes correctly. In several wrong orders, yet he appears at the end with nothing suitable to follow, leaving an incomplete clause. Only the order B A C yields a smooth, natural sentence.

Common Pitfalls:
Examinees often focus only on meaning and ignore verb forms like had plus past participle. Another frequent mistake is not noticing that Indian must be followed by a noun such as cinema. Always check that auxiliaries are followed by correct forms and that open phrases like yet he are properly completed by a full clause.

Final Answer:
The most logical and grammatically correct order of the fragments is BAC, producing the sentence I learnt he had never been to India, yet he spoke about yoga, slums, and Indian cinema with conviction.