Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: They are relatively nutrient-poor environments over large areas.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When studying global ecology, it is important to compare how nutrients are distributed in different biomes. Land ecosystems and open ocean ecosystems differ greatly in the availability of key nutrients needed by primary producers. This question asks you to recall how open oceans are usually described in terms of nutrient levels, especially compared with terrestrial habitats.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Although the oceans cover most of Earth surface, large regions of the open ocean are biological deserts in terms of nutrient availability. Sunlight penetrates the upper layers and allows photosynthesis, but essential mineral nutrients can be very limited, especially away from coasts and upwelling zones. Because dead organic matter sinks, many nutrients end up in deeper waters and are not easily recycled back to the surface without physical mixing. Therefore, open oceans are often described as nutrient limited or nutrient poor, despite having abundant water and widespread light at the surface. The correct option should capture this idea.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that primary productivity in many parts of the open ocean is limited by low concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, or other micronutrients.
Step 2: Recognize that coastal regions and upwelling zones can be nutrient rich, but these are not representative of the vast open ocean gyres.
Step 3: Evaluate option A, which claims the open oceans are rich in silica and iron everywhere. In reality, micronutrients like iron are often limiting, especially in high nutrient low chlorophyll regions.
Step 4: Evaluate option C, which states there is unlimited nitrogen. This is incorrect, because nitrogen limitation is common in many marine areas.
Step 5: Evaluate option D, which suggests oceans are nutrient rich everywhere. This ignores large oligotrophic zones with very low nutrient concentrations.
Step 6: Conclude that option B, describing the open oceans as relatively nutrient poor over large areas, best matches ecological observations.
Verification / Alternative check:
Maps of global ocean productivity show that the highest chlorophyll concentrations and productivity occur near coasts, at upwelling zones, and in some polar regions. Large subtropical gyres in the Pacific and Atlantic appear as low productivity regions, even though they receive plenty of sunlight. Limnology and oceanography studies emphasize nutrient limitation in these regions. In contrast, many soils on land can be locally rich in nutrients due to weathering, decomposition, and human fertilization, leading to higher productivity where water is sufficient. This comparison confirms that open oceans are often described as nutrient poor relative to many land ecosystems.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A: While some parts of the ocean contain silica and iron, these nutrients can be scarce and limiting in many regions. It is misleading to call the entire open ocean rich in these minerals.
Option C: Nitrogen is one of the most common limiting nutrients in both terrestrial and marine ecosystems. It is certainly not unlimited in the open ocean.
Option D: Nutrient rich conditions occur in specific marine environments, but cannot be generalized to the entire open ocean. Most of the open ocean is classified as oligotrophic, meaning low in nutrients.
Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes assume that because the ocean is vast and supports fisheries, it must be nutrient rich everywhere. Another pitfall is to confuse the abundance of water and light with abundance of mineral nutrients. Remember that productivity depends not only on sunlight but also on the availability of essential nutrients, which can be very low in open ocean surface waters. Always distinguish between localized nutrient rich regions and the broader global pattern.
Final Answer:
Compared with land ecosystems, the open oceans are best described as relatively nutrient poor environments over large areas.
Discussion & Comments