Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Perspective drawings are categorized by how many sets of parallel edges appear to converge, which leads to terms such as one-point, two-point, and three-point perspective. This item probes whether “one-point perspective” is also called “angular perspective,” a term that is sometimes misused by beginners.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
One-point perspective is also known as frontal perspective because one principal face of the object is kept parallel to the picture plane and depth recedes to a single vanishing point. By contrast, angular or two-point perspective presents an object rotated so that two sets of edges recede, each to its own vanishing point along the horizon line. Therefore, equating one-point with angular perspective is a terminology error.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify how many vanishing points are used in “one-point” (exactly one).Recall that “angular perspective” refers to a rotated view with two vanishing points (two-point perspective).Compare: one-point (frontal) ≠ angular (two-point).Conclude the statement is inaccurate.
Verification / Alternative check:
Open any standard graphics text: the terms “frontal (one-point)” and “angular (two-point)” are explicitly distinguished. Example illustrations show cubes seen head-on (one-point) versus seen at a corner (two-point).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Only true for interior scenes” and “architectural drafting” confuse application areas with definitions. “Only true when the object is tilted” describes two-point, not one-point.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming “angular” means any perspective with angles visible. It specifically denotes the two-vanishing-point setup, not the single-point, frontal case.
Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments