Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Sikhs
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Odd-one-out tasks in general knowledge frequently rely on a single, stable attribute that partitions items into incompatible categories. Here, three entries are well-known indigenous tribal communities of India, usually grouped under the umbrella of Scheduled Tribes or recognized ethnic groups. One entry, however, denotes a large, organized religion/community with its own doctrine, clergy, places of worship, and pan-regional membership. This categorical mismatch cleanly identifies the outlier.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Classify each option by socio-cultural type. Tribal groups are indigenous, endogamous communities with distinctive languages, customary law, and localized territories. A religion/community like Sikhism transcends tribe/ethnicity, has scripture (Guru Granth Sahib), codified practices, and institutional structures (gurdwaras) spanning regions and nations. The presence of a religion among tribal identifiers yields a 3-vs-1 split.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Cross-check institutional markers: tribes are classified under ethnographic and constitutional categories; Sikhism is cataloged under religions, with doctrines, rites, and clergy. The domains do not overlap.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Bhils, Todas, and Nagas all denote indigenous tribal identities, aligning with each other and not with an organized religion label.
Common Pitfalls:
Do not conflate “community” with “tribe.” Many communities exist, but the criterion here is tribal identity vs religion.
Final Answer:
Sikhs
Discussion & Comments