Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Greenhouse effect (anthropogenic warming context)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Carbon dioxide sources and sinks determine climate forcing. While oceans absorb CO2, human activities increase atmospheric CO2, enhancing the greenhouse effect. This legacy question uses the phrase “increased by the greenhouse effect” as a shorthand often seen in exam banks, even though strictly speaking elevated CO2 drives the greenhouse effect rather than the reverse.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In rigorous terms: anthropogenic emissions (fossil fuels, land-use change) increase CO2, which strengthens the greenhouse effect. However, because the option set omits those direct drivers, the best available answer corresponds to the exam shorthand connecting increased CO2 with the greenhouse effect framework. Forestation and vegetation uptake act as sinks; rainfall scavenging has negligible net long-term impact on CO2 concentration.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Eliminate sinks: forestation and vegetation tend to reduce atmospheric CO2 via photosynthesis.Eliminate rain: does not materially sequester CO2 long-term in the atmosphere–ocean system.Select the remaining exam-bank proxy: greenhouse effect (standing in for anthropogenic climate forcing narrative).
Verification / Alternative check:
Modern curricula emphasize that CO2 rise causes the greenhouse effect to intensify. When direct options are absent, test keys often choose the greenhouse effect label as the nearest proxy.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Forestation/Vegetation: net CO2 uptake.Rain: transient dissolution; does not drive long-term atmospheric increase.Oceanic upwelling only: can release CO2 regionally but is not offered as an option here except “only,” which is overly narrow.
Common Pitfalls:
Reversing cause and effect between CO2 and the greenhouse effect; ensure conceptual clarity even when multiple-choice wording is imperfect.
Final Answer:
Greenhouse effect (anthropogenic warming context)
Discussion & Comments