Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 234
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This number series grows quite rapidly, indicating that the differences between consecutive terms are themselves increasing. The question tests whether you can detect a pattern in these differences and then extend that pattern to find the missing term logically and accurately.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- The series is: 13, 27, 56, 115, ?- All terms are positive integers.- The pattern likely involves a rule on the differences between consecutive terms.
Concept / Approach:
We will compute the successive differences between the terms and check whether these differences follow a simple relation such as doubling, adding a constant, or another simple recurrence. Once we find such a rule, we can apply it to the last known difference to obtain the next difference and thus the missing term in the original series.
Step-by-Step Solution:
- First difference: 27 - 13 = 14.- Second difference: 56 - 27 = 29.- Third difference: 115 - 56 = 59.- The differences are: 14, 29, 59.- Observe the pattern: 14 * 2 + 1 = 29, and 29 * 2 + 1 = 59.- So each new difference is obtained by doubling the previous difference and then adding 1.- Apply this rule to get the next difference: 59 * 2 + 1 = 119.- Add this next difference to the last known term: 115 + 119 = 234.- Therefore, the missing term in the series is 234.
Verification / Alternative check:
- Reconstruct the series using the difference rule: start with 13, then add 14, 29, 59, 119.- 13 + 14 = 27, 27 + 29 = 56, 56 + 59 = 115, 115 + 119 = 234.- All terms match the given series and the newly found term, confirming the pattern and the answer.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- 224, 231, and 233 do not equal 115 plus 119, and none of them preserves the rule difference(n+1) = 2 * difference(n) + 1.- Choosing any of these would break the internal structure of the difference sequence and make future extensions inconsistent.- Only 234 fits perfectly with the difference pattern discovered.
Common Pitfalls:
A common mistake is to look only for a direct multiplicative relation between consecutive terms and miss the elegant pattern in the differences. Another pitfall is to spot that the differences are increasing but fail to test a simple recurrence like doubling plus one. Always examine difference patterns and test simple recurrences on them before concluding that no pattern exists.
Final Answer:
The number that correctly completes the series is 234, so the correct option is 234.
Discussion & Comments