Consider the following number pattern: 4 x 9 x 3 = 4 and 5 x 3 x 1 = 3. Using the same hidden rule, what is the value of 9 x 9 x 7 = ?

Difficulty: Hard

Correct Answer: 7

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This question is a classic number puzzle where the usual meaning of the symbol x is hidden behind a special rule. Two sample equations are already solved for you, and you must decode the underlying pattern or operation that converts three given numbers into a single result. Once that rule is understood, you can apply it to a new triple of numbers and determine the missing value from the options. Such questions test a student's ability to detect patterns, experiment with different operations, and reason logically rather than performing standard arithmetic only.


Given Data / Assumptions:


    - The expression 4 x 9 x 3 has been defined to give 4 as the result.
    - The expression 5 x 3 x 1 has been defined to give 3 as the result.
    - We assume the hidden rule is the same in both examples and also applies to 9 x 9 x 7.
    - The usual priority of operations is not relevant here; instead, a special formula is being used.


Concept / Approach:
The key idea is to search for a consistent relationship that uses all three numbers in each expression. For puzzles like this, we often experiment with combinations of addition, subtraction, and multiplication. After trying simple patterns, we can arrive at a rule that works for both examples:


    - Multiply the first and second numbers.
    - Multiply the second and third numbers.
    - Subtract the second product from the first product.
    - Subtract twice the first number.
    - Finally, add the third number.
This rule can be written in a compact form as:
Result = (first * second) - (second * third) - 2 * first + third


Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Use the rule for 4 x 9 x 3. First = 4, Second = 9, Third = 3. Compute first * second = 4 * 9 = 36. Compute second * third = 9 * 3 = 27. Subtract these: 36 - 27 = 9. Subtract twice the first number: 9 - 2 * 4 = 9 - 8 = 1. Add the third number: 1 + 3 = 4, which matches the given result. Step 2: Use the same rule for 5 x 3 x 1. First = 5, Second = 3, Third = 1. first * second = 5 * 3 = 15. second * third = 3 * 1 = 3. Difference: 15 - 3 = 12. Subtract twice the first: 12 - 2 * 5 = 12 - 10 = 2. Add the third: 2 + 1 = 3, which matches the second given result. Step 3: Apply the rule to 9 x 9 x 7. First = 9, Second = 9, Third = 7. first * second = 9 * 9 = 81. second * third = 9 * 7 = 63. Difference: 81 - 63 = 18. Subtract twice the first: 18 - 2 * 9 = 18 - 18 = 0. Add the third: 0 + 7 = 7.


Verification / Alternative check:
After finding a rule that fits both worked examples and produces an integer for the unknown case, we must confirm consistency. The chosen rule produces exactly the known outputs 4 and 3, and also gives a neat, whole number 7 for the new triple. If we tried simpler guesses such as sums, averages, or basic products, they would not match all given results. That supports the validity of this more detailed pattern for the purposes of this puzzle.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Values 5, 6, and 9 do not satisfy the discovered rule. If we plug 9 x 9 x 7 into the formula and force the answer to be 5 or 6 or 9, at least one of the sample equations (4 x 9 x 3 or 5 x 3 x 1) would no longer match its stated result. Hence, those options are inconsistent with the established pattern and must be rejected.


Common Pitfalls:
Many learners focus only on very simple patterns such as a + b - c, a * b + c, or counting digits. Those attempts quickly fail when tested against both examples. Another common mistake is to try to use standard arithmetic precedence, treating x as usual multiplication and expecting equality in the normal sense. However, in such reasoning questions, x is usually a placeholder for a hidden operation, not ordinary multiplication.


Final Answer:
Using the consistent hidden rule for all three triples, the value of 9 x 9 x 7 is 7.

More Questions from Mathematical Operations

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion