Windows NT network assessment: You manage eight NT servers and plan to move them to different network segments. Which tool on each server best measures which server generates the most network traffic?

Technical Questions Networking Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    NBTSTAT
  • B
    NETSTAT.EXE
  • C
    Performance Monitor
  • D
    Network Monitor
  • E
    ARP.EXE

Answer

Correct Answer: Network Monitor

Explanation

Introduction / Context:When planning network segmentation or server relocation, administrators need visibility into traffic volumes per host. Windows NT offered several TCP/IP tools, but only some are suitable for measuring packet flows and bandwidth usage. This question evaluates knowledge of the correct utility for network traffic analysis in an NT environment.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Eight Windows NT servers are involved.
  • Goal is to determine which server generates the most traffic.
  • Measurement must be done on each server before re-segmenting the network.
  • Classic NT toolset applies (no third-party analyzers assumed).

Concept / Approach:

Windows NT includes Network Monitor (and an agent) that captures and analyzes packets, showing per-host traffic statistics and protocols. While Performance Monitor can show interface counters, Network Monitor provides protocol-level visibility and capture capabilities, making it preferable for identifying the top talkers and understanding traffic composition.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the need: quantify per-server traffic and analyze packets.Match need to tool: Network Monitor captures and summarizes network frames.Confirm alternatives: PerfMon counters are coarse, not packet-centric.Select Network Monitor as the best fit for measuring which server generates the most traffic.

Verification / Alternative check:

Cross-check by enabling Performance Monitor counters (Bytes Total/sec) on NICs to validate trends, then use Network Monitor to capture a representative interval for detailed confirmation of the highest traffic generator.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • NBTSTAT: Focused on NetBIOS over TCP/IP name tables and sessions, not traffic quantification.
  • NETSTAT.EXE: Displays connections and listening ports; limited for traffic volume analysis.
  • Performance Monitor: Helpful but less granular than a protocol analyzer for per-conversation traffic.
  • ARP.EXE: Manipulates the ARP cache; irrelevant to traffic measurement.

Common Pitfalls:

Assuming open connections imply high traffic; a single idle TCP session may contribute little. Always measure bytes or frames over time. Ensure captures occur during peak windows to avoid misleading off-peak data.

Final Answer:

Network Monitor

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion