Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Mutual inductance quantifies how effectively a changing current in one coil induces a voltage in another. Coil orientation and core material are key design variables in transformers, inductive sensors, and wireless power systems.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Mutual inductance M = k * sqrt(L1 * L2). The coupling coefficient k is maximized when the magnetic axes of the coils are aligned so that the primary’s flux directly links the secondary. When coils are oriented at right angles (orthogonal), the linked flux is minimized, and k trends toward zero.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Consider coil axes: parallel alignment → maximum shared flux; right-angle alignment → minimal shared flux.Flux linkage drives induced voltage: e2 = M * di1/dt; with small k at right angles, e2 is small.Therefore, mutual inductance does not require right-angle orientation and is actually minimized in that orientation.Conclusion: The statement requiring right-angle placement is false.Verification / Alternative check:Transformer design universally aligns windings concentrically on a common core to maximize coupling; cross-axis placement is used when intentional low coupling is desired (e.g., some pickup coils).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Correct: Would assert an incorrect geometrical condition.
High-frequency or nonmagnetic qualifiers do not invert the fundamental orientation effect: aligned axes produce more coupling than orthogonal axes.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing electromagnetic interference reduction strategies (orthogonal placement reduces coupling) with the requirement for mutual inductance. Assuming any proximity guarantees strong coupling.
Final Answer:Incorrect
Discussion & Comments