Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Does not apply
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
A multiplexer is often called a “data selector.” It forwards one of several input lines to a single output based on select inputs. This question tests whether a MUX inherently produces a fixed output sequence on each clock pulse, which would actually describe a counter or sequence generator, not a MUX.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A MUX is purely combinational: Output Y = Dk where k is the index set by S. If a clock drives the select lines through a counter, the observed output may change in a pattern—but the MUX itself is not the sequence generator. The “fixed sequence on each clock” description fits counters or shift registers, not multiplexers.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Datasheets for basic MUX ICs (e.g., 74HC151) list propagation delay and truth table only—no clock, no internal state.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Applies: misidentifies the device function.
“Only if select lines are clocked”: even then, the pattern comes from the external counter, not from the MUX.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming “clocked” equals “sequential”; forgetting a MUX is combinational.
Final Answer:
Does not apply
Discussion & Comments