Two types of brass contain Copper and Zinc in the ratios 8:3 and 15:7 respectively (Copper:Zinc). If these two types of brass are melted and mixed in the ratio 5:2 (first type : second type), what will be the ratio of Copper to Zinc in the new brass alloy?

Difficulty: Hard

Correct Answer: 5:2

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This is an alloy composition (mixture) problem. Each brass type has a fixed copper-to-zinc ratio, which means each type has a fixed fraction of copper and a fixed fraction of zinc. When you mix them in a given amount ratio, you must compute copper and zinc contributed by each portion and then add the totals. Finally, convert the resulting totals into the simplest copper:zinc ratio. This is similar to mixing solutions by concentration.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Type 1 brass: Copper:Zinc = 8:3
  • Type 2 brass: Copper:Zinc = 15:7
  • Mixing ratio (Type 1 : Type 2) = 5:2
  • Assume 5 units of Type 1 and 2 units of Type 2


Concept / Approach:
Convert ratios to fractions. Type 1 total parts = 11, so copper fraction = 8/11 and zinc fraction = 3/11. Type 2 total parts = 22, so copper fraction = 15/22 and zinc fraction = 7/22. Multiply each fraction by its mixed amount (5 or 2), then add copper totals and zinc totals, and simplify.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Type 1 (amount 5): copper = 5*(8/11) = 40/11, zinc = 5*(3/11) = 15/11 Type 2 (amount 2): copper = 2*(15/22) = 30/22 = 15/11, zinc = 2*(7/22) = 14/22 = 7/11 Total copper = 40/11 + 15/11 = 55/11 = 5 Total zinc = 15/11 + 7/11 = 22/11 = 2 Copper:Zinc = 5:2


Verification / Alternative check:
The totals became clean integers after combining, which strongly indicates correct fraction handling and common denominators. Since 5 and 2 share no common factor, the ratio is already simplified.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
3:2 and 3:4 do not match the computed totals and imply incorrect contribution calculations. 2:3 reverses dominance and would mean zinc exceeds copper, which is impossible here because both brass types have more copper than zinc. 7:5 suggests too much zinc relative to copper compared to both input alloys.


Common Pitfalls:
Using 8/3 or 15/7 directly as copper fraction, forgetting to convert to total parts (8+3 and 15+7), or forgetting to scale each type by the mixing ratio 5:2.


Final Answer:
The ratio of Copper to Zinc in the new alloy is 5:2.

More Questions from Alligation or Mixture

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion