Perpetual Motion of the First Kind (PMM-1) – First-Law Feasibility A machine that produces net work without any energy input (violates energy conservation) is called a PMM-1 and is impossible according to the First Law of Thermodynamics.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: impossible

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Thermodynamics classifies hypothetical perpetual-motion machines by which law they violate. PMM-1 devices claim to create energy from nothing. Identifying their impossibility strengthens understanding of energy conservation.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Closed system or cycle allegedly delivering net work output.
  • No heat or other energy input from surroundings.
  • Classical macroscopic thermodynamics.


Concept / Approach:

The First Law states ΔE = Q − W for a cycle, where ΔE = 0. Therefore, for a device producing work W > 0 in a cycle, a compensating heat input Q = W must be supplied. A PMM-1 claims W > 0 while Q = 0, which contradicts ΔE = 0 and violates energy conservation.


Step-by-Step Solution:

For a cycle, set ΔE = 0.Apply the First Law: 0 = Q − W → Q = W.If Q = 0 but W > 0, the equality is broken.Hence, PMM-1 cannot exist; it is impossible.


Verification / Alternative check:

No experimental evidence has ever demonstrated PMM-1; all verified engines obey Q_in ≥ W_out over a cycle with residual losses.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Superconductivity or zero friction reduce losses but do not create energy. Ambient temperature does not circumvent conservation of energy.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing PMM-1 with PMM-2 (which violates the Second Law). Believing lossless components alone enable perpetual work output.


Final Answer:

impossible

More Questions from Thermodynamics

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion