Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: impossible
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Thermodynamics classifies hypothetical perpetual-motion machines by which law they violate. PMM-1 devices claim to create energy from nothing. Identifying their impossibility strengthens understanding of energy conservation.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The First Law states ΔE = Q − W for a cycle, where ΔE = 0. Therefore, for a device producing work W > 0 in a cycle, a compensating heat input Q = W must be supplied. A PMM-1 claims W > 0 while Q = 0, which contradicts ΔE = 0 and violates energy conservation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
No experimental evidence has ever demonstrated PMM-1; all verified engines obey Q_in ≥ W_out over a cycle with residual losses.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Superconductivity or zero friction reduce losses but do not create energy. Ambient temperature does not circumvent conservation of energy.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing PMM-1 with PMM-2 (which violates the Second Law). Believing lossless components alone enable perpetual work output.
Final Answer:
impossible
Discussion & Comments