Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: True
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Identifying classic ideal cycles from their process makeup helps in selecting appropriate analysis methods and understanding performance limits. The Ericsson cycle is frequently compared with Carnot, Stirling, and Joule (Brayton) cycles, so clarity about its component processes is essential.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The Ericsson cycle consists of two isothermal legs (compression at the lower temperature and expansion at the higher temperature) and two isobaric regenerative legs. The isobaric legs transfer heat internally between the hot and cold streams in a regenerator, enabling the cycle to approach Carnot efficiency under ideal conditions. By contrast, the Stirling cycle uses isothermal legs plus two constant-volume (isochoric) regenerative legs, and the Joule (Brayton) cycle uses two isentropic legs with two constant-pressure heat-transfer legs to external reservoirs (not regenerative by definition).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Graphically, T–s shows two horizontal isotherms linked by near-horizontal isobars (with regeneration), whereas Stirling would show vertical isochores for the regenerative legs. Textbook definitions align with this process identification.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Calling it Stirling confuses isobaric with isochoric regeneration. Restricting to 'open cycles' is unnecessary. While perfect regeneration is an idealization, the cycle definition itself is indeed two isothermal plus two isobaric processes.
Common Pitfalls:
Mixing Ericsson and Brayton; assuming any constant-pressure legs imply Brayton rather than recognizing the isothermal legs that define Ericsson.
Final Answer:
True
Discussion & Comments