Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: decrease the mass flow rate and to increase the wetness of steam
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Real steam nozzles are not frictionless. Wall friction and boundary-layer growth introduce irreversibilities that alter discharge, velocity, pressure distribution, and condensation behavior. Recognizing the signs of these changes is important for diagnosing performance shortfalls on test stands and in service.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Friction converts some of the available isentropic enthalpy drop into internal energy (heating) rather than kinetic energy. This reduces the achievable velocity at a given pressure ratio and effectively lowers the discharge for the same upstream stagnation conditions and back pressure. Moreover, in wet-steam conditions, irreversible mixing and wall heat transfer promote additional condensation, reducing dryness fraction and thus increasing wetness (mass fraction of liquid). The result is a lower mass flow than ideal and a wetter exhaust.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Empirical discharge coefficients for steam nozzles (Cd < 1) capture reduced mass flow relative to isentropic predictions. Moisture measurements downstream of high-load nozzles commonly show greater wetness than ideal models predict.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Options claiming increased mass flow contradict the universal trend of Cd < 1 with friction. Decreased wetness is unlikely in condensing flows with friction. A claim of ‘‘no change’’ ignores real, measurable losses.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing static temperature trends (which can locally rise due to frictional dissipation) with overall discharge behavior; the key combined effect remains reduced mass flow rate and increased moisture.
Final Answer:
decrease the mass flow rate and to increase the wetness of steam
Discussion & Comments