Dynamics to statics transformation – name the principle A moving fluid mass can be analyzed at a notional static equilibrium by applying an imaginary inertia force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the real accelerating force. This statement is called:

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: D'Alembert's principle

Explanation:


Introduction:
Converting a dynamics problem into an equivalent statics problem by introducing inertia forces is a classic technique in mechanics and fluid dynamics. The question asks for the name of the principle embodying this equivalence for accelerating systems.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Finite mass of fluid undergoes acceleration.
  • We conceptually add an inertia force equal and opposite to m * a.
  • Analysis is then performed as if forces sum to zero (static equilibrium).


Concept / Approach:

D’Alembert’s principle reformulates Newton’s second law as an equilibrium condition by adding the fictitious inertia force F_inertia = − m * a to the system’s external forces. In fluid mechanics, this is used in accelerating containers (e.g., tilting free surfaces), rotating systems, and unsteady Bernoulli derivations, enabling static-like pressure field computations in non-inertial frames.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Step 1: Start from Newton’s second law: ΣF = m * a.Step 2: Add − m * a to both sides to form ΣF + (− m * a) = 0.Step 3: Interpret the augmented force system as static equilibrium in a non-inertial frame.Step 4: Use the static balance to compute pressure distributions or resultant forces.


Verification / Alternative check:

Applications include deriving pressure fields in linearly accelerated tanks (free surface tilts with tan(theta) = a/g) and rotating fluids (parabolic free surface), both obtained via D’Alembert’s construct.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Pascal / Archimedes / Bernoulli: Respectively deal with pressure transmission, buoyancy, and mechanical energy conservation, not the statics–dynamics transformation.None of these: Incorrect because the statement exactly matches D’Alembert’s principle.


Common Pitfalls:

Calling the method “fictitious forces” and assuming they are arbitrary. They are systematic constructs that allow equilibrium methods in accelerating frames.


Final Answer:

D'Alembert's principle

More Questions from Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion