Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Optical pyrometer
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
At temperatures approaching 2000°C, contact sensors face survivability and measurement-error challenges. Non-contact optical methods that rely on visible incandescence are preferred for filaments and mantles. This question distinguishes between optical, radiation, and contact approaches at extreme temperatures.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
An optical pyrometer (disappearing-filament type) compares the brightness of a calibrated filament to the target’s brightness at a specific wavelength. When the filament “disappears” against the target, their brightness temperatures match. This technique works well from roughly 700°C up to 3000°C and is ideal for incandescent mantles. Total-radiation pyrometers are also high-temperature capable but are generally used for larger, opaque targets; classic exam convention associates filaments/mantles with optical pyrometers.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Manufacturer datasheets for optical pyrometers list upper ranges near or above 2500°C, confirming suitability for incandescent sources.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any radiation pyrometer is equivalent; brightness (optical) pyrometers are textbook choices for incandescent mantles.
Final Answer:
Optical pyrometer
Discussion & Comments