Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 25–30
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Overall thermal efficiency for fuel-fired furnaces accounts for useful heat delivered to the load divided by the chemical energy in the fuel. For conventional lumpy-coal-fired heating furnaces (e.g., older reheat or small industrial units), stack losses, wall losses, and incomplete heat recovery limit achievable efficiency compared to modern regenerative/recuperative designs.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Typical literature values place plain, non-regenerative solid-fuel heating furnaces in the low-to-mid 20–30% range when averaged over a shift, because of high excess air, intermittent firing, radiation through walls/doors, and hot-flue losses. Higher values require extensive waste-heat recovery or continuous high-load operation with tight control.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Recognize realistic loss mechanisms: stack temperature, wall radiation, leakage, and incomplete heat transfer to the load.Compare ranges: 10–15% is unusually low for a sound furnace; 45–70% is characteristic of advanced recuperative/regenerative/heavy-duty units.Select the typical range: 25–30%.Verification / Alternative check:Benchmarking of traditional shop furnaces shows fuel-to-load efficiencies in the mid-20s without strong heat recovery or continuous operation at design capacity.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Confusing boiler thermal efficiency with furnace efficiency; furnaces heating solids often have lower efficiency than steam generators.
Final Answer:25–30
Discussion & Comments