Home » Logical Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should the consumption of aerated drinks be banned in India? Arguments: Yes. This is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases. No. Each individual should have right to choose what he wants. No. There is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on human body. Yes. It is banned in many other countries also.

Correct Answer: Only III is strong

Explanation:

The use of 'only' in I makes it invalid. Also, it is the duty of the government to save its citizens from intake of any harmful products, even if they like them. So, II does not hold strong. Besides, a product must not be banned unless its harmful effects have been proved. So, III holds strong. Lastly, we cannot blindly follow the decisions taken by other countries. So, IV also does not hold.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion