Statement–Courses of Action (demography and response): A recent census reports an alarmingly low female-to-male ratio; determine which course(s) logically follow—(I) conduct another census to verify, (II) immediately direct departments to encourage improvement in the ratio—considering reliability, urgency, and actionability.

Given data

• Statement: Census reveals a serious gender imbalance.
• Course I: Repeat the census to verify results.
• Course II: Issue immediate directives to promote improvement (awareness, enforcement, incentives).

Concept / Approach
When data quality is not in question, the appropriate course is to act on the finding rather than to re-collect data without cause.

Step-by-step evaluation
Step 1: A national census is a rigorous exercise; absent evidence of error, ordering another census is wasteful and delays intervention.Step 2: Directing departments to take measures (II) is immediate, targeted, and addresses the core issue.

Verification / Alternative
Standard administrative response to alarming indicators is to operationalise corrective programmes first; re-measurement is justified only if there is credible doubt about data integrity.

Common pitfalls

• Mistaking urgency for the need to re-survey; action and monitoring can proceed with the existing official data.

Final Answer
Only II follows.