Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: None of these
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
A municipal plan proposes cheaper bottled mineral water. We must evaluate courses of action that are logical responses rather than predictions or unnecessary consequences.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In Courses of Action, accept actions that are necessary steps directly supported by the statement. Reject mere speculations about outcomes (closures, losses) and actions that are unrelated or extreme (stopping tap water).
Step-by-Step Solution:
I: “Private companies will have to close” is a conjecture, not an action the civic body should take. It is not a course of action and is not logically compelled.II: “Provide for losses in the budget” presumes the project will incur losses. The statement gives no evidence of projected loss; hence it does not follow.III: Stopping tap-water schemes is unrelated and harmful to public health. The bottled-water initiative does not logically imply discontinuing piped supply.
Verification / Alternative check:
Reasonable courses would involve feasibility studies, cost analysis, and quality control—not stated here. None of I–III necessarily follow from the statement.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing predictions or consequences with actionable, justified steps.
Final Answer:
None of these
Discussion & Comments