Read the four labelled sentences P, Q, R and S about the expression "laws of nature" and choose the option that gives the most logical order to form a clear and coherent paragraph.

Introduction / Context:
This question tests the skill of arranging four related sentences into a coherent paragraph. The sentences discuss the expression "laws of nature" and why this wording can be misleading. To answer such a para jumble question, a learner has to identify the introductory idea, link follow up explanations in a logical way, and then end with a concluding effect. Mastering this type of question improves reading comprehension, logical sequencing, and the ability to recognise how ideas flow in an English paragraph.

Given Data / Assumptions:
- Four labelled sentences P, Q, R and S are given.
- They all talk about "laws of nature" and the way the term law is used.
- We must choose the order which forms a meaningful and coherent paragraph.
- The answer options are sequences of these labels like QSRP, SQRP, QSPR and SQPR.

Concept / Approach:
For para jumble questions, we usually look for the best opening sentence, supporting explanations, contrast markers, and a natural closing remark. Introductory sentences often define a topic or comment on terminology. Follow up lines explain or justify that comment. Here, the word law is said to be unfortunate, and other sentences discuss how it might be better to speak of uniformities of nature and how that would remove a common misunderstanding. We must link these ideas in a smooth, progressive way without breaking the logical chain.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Sentence S states that the use of the word law in this context is rather unfortunate. This clearly introduces the topic and sets up a criticism of the term.Step 2: Sentence Q explains why this use is problematic by saying that laws of nature are not commands but statements of fact. This directly supports the claim in S and therefore naturally follows it.Step 3: Sentence P suggests an alternative expression. It says that it would be better to speak of uniformities of nature, which fits as a recommendation after explaining the problem with the term law.Step 4: Sentence R then clarifies the benefit of this new expression. It says that this would remove the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. That sounds like a conclusion which describes the positive result of the change proposed in P.Step 5: Putting these together gives the order S Q P R, which matches the sequence SQPR in the options.

Verification / Alternative check:
If we try any other option as the starting point, the paragraph becomes awkward. For example, if we begin with Q, we get a statement about laws of nature without any reason why the term is being questioned. If we begin with P, we are told that it would be better to speak of uniformities, but we do not know what expression is being replaced or why. Only S introduces the theme by calling the word law unfortunate. After that, Q, P and R fall into place naturally as explanation, suggestion, and resulting benefit. This confirms that SQPR is the only coherent order.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- QSRP starts with Q and does not first explain why the term law is unfortunate, so S appears abruptly in the middle.
- SQRP ends with P and leaves the result of the new term unexplained since R, which gives the benefit, is missing at the end.
- QSPR again starts with Q without an introductory remark and places S later in a way that breaks the flow of reasoning.

Common Pitfalls:
Students often pick an option simply because it looks grammatically smooth, without checking whether it has a clear introduction and conclusion. Another frequent mistake is to focus only on local links between two sentences instead of seeing the overall progression from problem to explanation to solution. In questions about terminology or definitions, the sentence that criticises or defines the term usually forms the natural start. Always check whether each subsequent sentence answers a clear question raised by the previous one, such as why, how, or with what result.

Final Answer:
The most logical and coherent order of the sentences is SQPR, so the correct option is the sequence SQPR.