wait/notify preconditions: calling wait() while holding the monitor but without a notifier.\n\npublic class WaitTest {\n public static void main(String[] args) {\n System.out.print("1 ");\n synchronized (args) {\n System.out.print("2 ");\n try { args.wait(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { }\n }\n System.out.print("3 ");\n }\n}

Introduction / Context:
This exercise probes correct use of Object.wait(). The thread must own the monitor of the object on which wait() is called, and typically some other thread should notify/notifyAll() to resume the waiting thread.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The code synchronizes on args and then calls args.wait().
• No other thread exists that could call notify/notifyAll() on the same monitor.
• InterruptedException is caught properly.

Concept / Approach:
The call occurs while holding the monitor, satisfying the precondition; thus no IllegalMonitorStateException is thrown. However, because no other thread notifies, the waiting thread never wakes up. Therefore the code prints “1 2” and then blocks indefinitely; “3” is never printed.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Adding a second thread that locks on args and invokes notify() would allow the main thread to resume and print “3”.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• IllegalMonitorStateException is not required to be handled and does not occur here.
• “1 2 3” and “1 3” contradict the waiting behavior.

Common Pitfalls:
Forgetting to pair wait() with a proper notify path; calling wait() without holding the monitor (which would cause IllegalMonitorStateException).

Final Answer:
1 2