Java interfaces and constants: what happens when code attempts to modify an interface field inside a loop? interface Count { short counter = 0; // implicitly public static final void countUp(); } public class TestCount implements Count { public static void main(String[] args) { TestCount t = new TestCount(); t.countUp(); } public void countUp() { for (int x = 6; x > counter; x--, ++counter) { System.out.print(" " + counter); } } }

Introduction / Context:
In Java, every field declared in an interface is implicitly public, static, and final. Attempting to change such a field at runtime violates the final constraint and should be caught at compile time. This question verifies familiarity with these interface rules and constant behavior.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Interface Count declares short counter = 0.
• Class TestCount implements Count and references counter directly.
• The for loop tries to execute ++counter in its update expression.

Concept / Approach:
Because Count.counter is a compile-time constant (final), it cannot be incremented. The statement ++counter attempts to assign a new value to a final variable, which is illegal. The compiler flags the increment as an error.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
A correct approach would use a local variable, e.g., short c = counter; then modify c within the loop while comparing against a fixed boundary.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• All printed sequences assume successful compilation and execution.

Common Pitfalls:
Forgetting the implicit modifiers on interface fields; assuming counter is an instance field that can be changed.

Final Answer:
Compilation fails