Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: An immutable object is one whose state cannot change after construction, because all fields are fixed and no setters or mutating methods are provided.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Immutable objects are a fundamental concept in Java and other object oriented languages, especially when dealing with concurrency, caching, and safe sharing of data. Classic examples such as String and wrapper classes demonstrate how immutability simplifies reasoning about code. This interview question checks whether you understand what immutability really means for an object and what design choices make a Java class effectively immutable in practice.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
An immutable object guarantees that once created, its observable state remains constant during its entire life. To achieve this, you usually declare all fields as private and final, initialize them in the constructor, and provide no setter methods or methods that modify these fields. If the class holds references to mutable objects, it uses defensive copying in constructors and getters so that external code cannot change the internal representation. This design makes instances thread safe by default because there are no race conditions around modifications to state.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that immutability means no change in state after object construction.
Step 2: Remember that fields in an immutable class are typically private and final, and they are completely initialized in the constructor.
Step 3: Note that there are no public setter methods and no methods that modify the internal fields.
Step 4: If mutable objects are used inside, the class should make defensive copies on input and output so that external code cannot modify internal data.
Step 5: Evaluate the options and choose the one that describes fixed state after construction with no setters and no mutating methods, which is option A.
Verification / Alternative check:
Think about the Java String class. After you create a String instance with a particular value, that value never changes. Any operation that appears to modify a String, such as concatenation or replace, actually returns a new String instance rather than changing the original one. This matches the idea that fields are fixed and cannot be changed after construction. In contrast, classes that allow direct field updates or provide setters do not behave like String and are not immutable, which supports the definition given in option A.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B is incorrect because multiple variables can reference the same immutable object safely; in fact, sharing is a common use case. Option C is wrong because having only primitive fields and no constructors does not automatically make a class immutable; fields might still be changed later if they are not final or if setters exist. Option D is incorrect because Java objects are always created on the heap, and stack location is not what defines immutability.
Common Pitfalls:
A common pitfall is to declare a class immutable but expose internal mutable objects directly through getters, which allows callers to change the internal state indirectly. Another issue is forgetting to make fields final, which makes it harder to reason about immutability. During interviews, it is helpful to mention concrete design rules such as private final fields, defensive copying, and no mutating methods. It is also useful to mention that immutable objects simplify concurrency because different threads can share them without synchronization.
Final Answer:
An immutable object in Java is one whose state cannot change after construction, which is achieved by using private final fields, initializing them fully in the constructor, and providing no setters or mutating methods.
Discussion & Comments