Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Autoboxing is the automatic conversion from a primitive value to its corresponding wrapper object type, and unboxing is the reverse conversion from a wrapper object back to a primitive value
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Autoboxing and unboxing are Java language features introduced to make working with primitive types and wrapper classes more convenient. Many collection classes and generic APIs operate on objects rather than primitives, so automatic conversions reduce boilerplate code. This question checks whether you understand what autoboxing and unboxing mean and how they operate behind the scenes in the Java compiler and runtime.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Autoboxing is the automatic conversion that the Java compiler applies when a primitive value is used in a context that expects the corresponding wrapper class. For example, assigning an int to an Integer variable or passing a primitive to a method that expects an Integer parameter. The compiler inserts calls like Integer.valueOf(intValue) behind the scenes. Unboxing is the reverse process, where a wrapper object is used in a context that expects a primitive. The compiler inserts calls such as intValue() to extract the primitive from the wrapper. These conversions make it easier to mix primitives and wrappers but can have performance and null safety implications.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Consider the code Integer x = 10; where 10 is a primitive int literal but x is an Integer reference. The compiler applies autoboxing and converts this to Integer x = Integer.valueOf(10);.
Step 2: Consider the expression int y = x; where x is an Integer. The compiler inserts unboxing code and effectively generates int y = x.intValue();.
Step 3: In collections, code like List
Verification / Alternative check:
You can inspect compiled bytecode using the javap tool to see the inserted calls to valueOf and primitive accessor methods. This confirms that the compiler is performing implicit conversions rather than relying on magical primitives that suddenly behave like objects. Documentation for Java language features explicitly describes autoboxing as the automatic conversion between primitive types and their corresponding wrapper classes, which aligns with option A.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B is wrong because converting objects to String is done with toString() or String.valueOf, and there is no special term autoboxing for that process. Option C confuses compilation and execution phases of Java, which are unrelated to primitive wrapper conversions. Option D misuses the terms autoboxing and unboxing in the context of exceptions, which is not their meaning in the language specification.
Common Pitfalls:
A common pitfall is forgetting that autoboxing and unboxing involve object creation and method calls, which can have performance costs in tight loops. Another danger is unboxing null wrapper references, which throws a NullPointerException. Developers should be careful when using wrapper types in collections if null values are possible and should avoid unnecessary boxing and unboxing in performance critical code.
Final Answer:
Autoboxing is the automatic conversion from a primitive value to its corresponding wrapper class object, and unboxing is the automatic conversion from that wrapper object back to the primitive value.
Discussion & Comments