Arithmetic property check: Is subtraction a commutative operation in arithmetic and digital design (i.e., does A − B always equal B − A)?

Introduction / Context:
Commutativity is a core algebraic property. Addition and multiplication are commutative over integers (A + B = B + A; A * B = B * A). However, subtraction and division generally are not. In digital systems, misunderstanding this can cause incorrect ALU design, bit-slice microarchitecture errors, or wrong simplifications in fixed-point pipelines. The prompt asks whether subtraction is commutative, which we will evaluate precisely with examples and reasoning.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Standard integer arithmetic (the argument extends to reals and fixed-point).
• No special modulo constraints unless explicitly declared.
• Binary subtractors follow the same algebraic property as decimal subtraction.

Concept / Approach:
Operation op is commutative if A op B = B op A for all A, B in a set. For subtraction, test with a counterexample: 7 − 3 = 4, but 3 − 7 = −4, which are not equal. Therefore, subtraction fails the commutativity test. In digital logic, two’s-complement subtraction A − B = A + (two’s-complement of B) preserves noncommutativity: flipping operands changes the result (and the sign) except in special cases.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Consider symbolic relation: A − B = −(B − A). Equality holds only when A = B (both sides 0). This reinforces the general noncommutativity claim.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct” contradicts basic arithmetic. The other conditions (nonnegative, modulo-2) do not fix noncommutativity; in modulo-2 arithmetic subtraction equals addition (XOR), but then the operator is effectively addition, not subtraction.

Common Pitfalls:
Conflating subtraction with adding a negative; forgetting that operand order matters in difference operations; misapplying properties of addition to subtraction.

Final Answer:
Incorrect