The question below consists of three labelled fragments P, Q and R that complete the sentence beginning with ‘‘Integrating diversity’’. Select the most logical order of P, Q and R to form a coherent statement.

Introduction / Context:
This question involves arranging three sentence fragments P, Q and R to complete the opening phrase Integrating diversity. The fragments describe how integrating diversity relates to governance and international human rights law. The learner must choose the order that produces a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence. Understanding how phrases like goes hand in hand with and which is firmly grounded in international human rights law work together is essential.

Given Data / Assumptions:
- The initial words provided are: Integrating diversity. - Fragment P: governance which is firmly grounded. - Fragment Q: in international human rights law. - Fragment R: goes hand in hand with. - We must arrange P, Q and R after Integrating diversity to form a clear statement.

Concept / Approach:
We look for a logical predicate to follow the subject phrase Integrating diversity. The fragment goes hand in hand with is a verbal phrase that naturally follows a subject, giving us Integrating diversity goes hand in hand with. This suggests that R should come immediately after the opening. The expression goes hand in hand with must then be followed by a noun phrase describing what it accompanies. Governance which is firmly grounded in international human rights law is such a noun phrase, and Q completes the prepositional phrase in international human rights law started by P. Therefore, the sequence after Integrating diversity should be R P Q.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Identify the predicate. Since Integrating diversity is the subject like element, we need a verb phrase. Fragment R, goes hand in hand with, provides this verb phrase and fits directly after the subject. Step 2: After R, we need the object of the preposition with. Fragment P begins with governance which is firmly grounded, which can function as the noun phrase following with. Step 3: Fragment P ends with firmly grounded, which requires a complement introduced by in. Fragment Q supplies this complement by giving in international human rights law. Step 4: Combine them: Integrating diversity goes hand in hand with governance which is firmly grounded in international human rights law. This is grammatically correct and conveys a complete idea. Step 5: Map this order of fragments R, P, Q to the options and note that it corresponds to option B, RPQ.

Verification / Alternative check:
Check the sentence formed by the chosen sequence: Integrating diversity goes hand in hand with governance which is firmly grounded in international human rights law. The message is clear: real integration of diversity is closely connected with governance based on human rights. Now test one of the other options, for example QPR: Integrating diversity in international human rights law governance which is firmly grounded goes hand in hand with. This is grammatically broken, as the verb phrase appears at the end and with has no clear object. This comparison confirms that RPQ is the only sequence that yields a natural sentence.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A (QPR): Starting with Q after Integrating diversity produces Integrating diversity in international human rights law, which could be acceptable, but placing governance which is firmly grounded next and goes hand in hand with at the end results in an incomplete clause. Option C (PRQ): Beginning with governance which is firmly grounded immediately after Integrating diversity gives Integrating diversity governance which is firmly grounded, which is not grammatical. Option D (QRP): The sequence leads to a sentence where in international human rights law goes hand in hand with governance which is firmly grounded, leaving Integrating diversity hanging at the start, which is awkward.

Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes ignore verb placement and choose an order that sounds impressive but is not grammatically correct. Another pitfall is to focus only on meaning and not on the function words with and in, which show how phrases fit together. Always identify the subject, verb and object pattern first, then see how the remaining fragments supply necessary complements to verbs and adjectives.

Final Answer:
The most logical order of fragments is RPQ, so option B is correct.