If the channel bandwidth available to a frequency-modulated (FM) system is doubled while keeping other conditions comparable to amplitude modulation (AM), by what factor does the improvement ratio γFM/γAM (output SNR ratio of FM to AM) typically increase?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Factor of 4

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
One advantage of wideband FM is improved output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared with AM, for a given received carrier power. This improvement grows with FM system deviation and effectively with the occupied bandwidth. Understanding how γFM/γAM scales with bandwidth guides design trade-offs between spectral efficiency and noise performance.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • γ denotes the ratio of output SNR to input SNR.
  • We compare FM and AM under comparable received power and noise conditions.
  • Bandwidth is increased by a factor of 2.


Concept / Approach:

For wideband FM, the output SNR improvement over AM is approximately proportional to the square of the peak frequency deviation (or modulation index for single-tone), which in turn scales with the occupied bandwidth (per Carson’s rule intuition). If bandwidth is doubled, the improvement factor scales roughly as the square, yielding approximately four times greater γFM/γAM, ignoring pre-emphasis and receiver details.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Assume wideband FM regime where SNR_o(FM) ∝ (deviation)^2 for a given noise floor.If bandwidth B → 2B, effective deviation (and thus improvement) scales → improvement factor ≈ (2)^2 = 4.Therefore, γFM/γAM increases by a factor of approximately 4.


Verification / Alternative check:

Classic FM noise theory shows that, absent threshold effects, FM demodulator output noise decreases as deviation increases; empirical lab setups confirm about quadratic scaling before practical limits (receiver IF bandwidth, pre-emphasis) intervene.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Factors 2 or 3: underestimate the quadratic dependence in the wideband regime.
  • Factor 6: not supported by the square-law trend.
  • No change: contradicts FM noise advantage principles.


Common Pitfalls:

Applying this scaling in the narrowband FM regime or near the FM threshold where different behaviors occur; ignoring pre-emphasis/de-emphasis which alters high-frequency noise shaping but not the basic wideband scaling trend.



Final Answer:

Factor of 4

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion