Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Gradually
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The origin of the solar system is explained by the nebular hypothesis, which states that the Sun and planets formed from a rotating cloud of gas and dust. This process involved many stages, including collapse of the nebula, formation of a protostar, and gradual accretion of planetesimals into planets. Understanding that this formation took a long time, rather than happening suddenly, is a fundamental concept in astronomy. This question asks which descriptive term best fits the timescale and nature of this formation process.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- The question refers to the formation of the solar system from a rotating cloud of gas and dust.
- Options include electrically, gradually, chemically, and rapidly.
- It is assumed that learners have basic knowledge of the nebular hypothesis or similar models.
- No exact numerical timescale is required, only a qualitative description.
Concept / Approach:
The nebular hypothesis suggests that over millions of years, gravitational forces caused the initial gas and dust cloud to collapse and flatten into a rotating disk. The Sun formed at the centre, while clumps of matter in the disk collided and stuck together, forming planetesimals and eventually planets. This is a slow, stepwise process taking vast amounts of time. Therefore, it is best described as gradual. Although chemical reactions and electrical forces play roles in specific stages, they do not characterise the overall process as a single word in the same way that gradual does. Rapid would imply a sudden formation over a very short timescale, which contradicts current scientific understanding.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Recall that the solar system formed from a large cloud of gas and dust according to the nebular hypothesis.
2. Recognise that gravitational collapse, rotation, and accretion of small bodies into planets took millions of years.
3. Understand that this long duration indicates a stepwise, slow process rather than a sudden event.
4. Compare the given descriptive terms and note that gradually best fits a long, multi stage process over a long time.
5. Conclude that gradually is the correct descriptor for solar system formation.
Verification / Alternative check:
Astronomy textbooks and reputable scientific sources describe solar system formation as taking tens of millions of years from initial collapse to the stabilisation of orbits. They discuss many intermediate stages, such as dust grain growth, planetesimal collisions, and late heavy bombardment, all of which indicate a drawn out process. These sources do not describe the formation as instantaneous or rapid on a human timescale. Instead, they emphasise that planetary systems emerge through gradual evolution within the protoplanetary disk, confirming that gradually is the most accurate choice.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Electrically: While electromagnetic forces contribute to some interactions, they do not define the overall manner of formation and are not the usual word used to describe the process.
Chemically: Chemical reactions occur within the forming bodies, but chemical change alone does not capture the large scale gravitational and dynamical evolution of the solar system.
Rapidly: This suggests a quick, sudden event, which contradicts evidence that the solar system took millions of years to form.
Common Pitfalls:
Some learners may be tempted to choose chemically or electrically because they know that chemistry and physics are involved. However, the question is asking about the general manner or timescale of formation, not about the types of forces or reactions. Another pitfall is to think of cosmic events as explosive and rapid by nature, but planet formation is actually a slow and gradual process compared with human lifetimes. Keeping the nebular hypothesis in mind helps avoid choosing terms that do not reflect the extended timescale involved.
Final Answer:
The solar system is best described as having formed gradually from a rotating cloud of gas and dust.
Discussion & Comments