In evolutionary biology, homology in structures is considered evidence of which fundamental idea about species?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Common ancestry of different species

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Homology is a key concept in evolutionary biology and comparative anatomy. When different organisms have structures that are similar in basic form and developmental origin, even if they perform different functions, these structures are called homologous. Exam questions often ask what such homology implies about the evolutionary relationship between the species involved.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The term homology is used for structural similarity between species.
  • We assume that the student knows classic examples like the forelimbs of humans, bats, whales, and horses.
  • The question asks what homology is evidence for, not just a definition.
  • We use standard evolutionary theory as described in biology textbooks.


Concept / Approach:
Homologous structures arise when different species inherit a basic body plan or structure from a common ancestor and then modify it over time through divergent evolution. For instance, the forelimb bones of a human arm, a bat wing, and a whale flipper have the same arrangement of humerus, radius, ulna, and digits, even though they perform different functions like grasping, flying, or swimming. This pattern is best explained if all these species share ancestral forms that possessed a similar limb structure. Therefore, homology is strong evidence for common ancestry.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that homologous structures are similar in underlying anatomy and developmental origin but may have different functions.Step 2: Think about the reason for such similarity across species; it is unlikely to be pure chance.Step 3: Apply the evolutionary explanation that similar structures are inherited from a common ancestor and then modified.Step 4: Option A directly states common ancestry of different species, which matches this explanation.Step 5: Divergent evolution in option B is related but cannot exist without some common ancestor, so the more fundamental idea is common ancestry.


Verification / Alternative check:
Evolutionary trees, or phylogenies, are constructed using many kinds of evidence, including homology in anatomy, embryology, and molecular sequences. When similar structures with shared details are seen in species that occupy different environments, the simplest explanation is that they inherited these structures from shared ancestors. Textbooks emphasise this point when presenting evidence for evolution, confirming that homology supports common ancestry.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B mentions divergent evolution but claims it occurs without shared ancestors, which contradicts the definition of divergence, because species diverge from a common ancestral population. Option C, punctuated evolution, refers to a particular pattern of evolutionary speed, not directly to evidence from homology. Option D, convergent evolution, explains similarities that arise independently in unrelated lineages, typically producing analogous, not homologous, structures. Option E, artificial selection, is about human guided breeding and does not explain natural homology patterns across wild species.


Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes confuse homology with analogy. Analogous structures, such as wings of birds and wings of insects, perform similar functions but arise independently and do not indicate close common ancestry. Homology, in contrast, reflects shared ancestry. Remember that homology points backwards in time to common ancestors, while analogy highlights similar selective pressures without necessarily implying close evolutionary relationship.


Final Answer:
Homology is considered strong evidence of Common ancestry of different species in evolutionary biology.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion