Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: All of the above
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The choice of carrier gas in GC affects efficiency, analysis speed, safety, and detector compatibility. Helium, nitrogen, and hydrogen are common options; each has trade-offs. Understanding why helium is widely used clarifies method robustness and safety.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Helium is inert and non-flammable, reducing side reactions and safety risks (versus hydrogen). Its diffusivity and viscosity yield a Van Deemter curve with a relatively flat minimum at practical linear velocities, enabling faster runs with good efficiency compared with nitrogen. It also works well with many detectors, especially MS (vacuum compatibility) and TCD, yielding stable baselines.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess chemical reactivity: helium is noble/inert → minimizes analyte or hardware reactions.Evaluate mass transfer: helium permits higher optimal linear velocities than nitrogen → shorter run times at similar efficiency.Confirm detector compatibility: helium is standard for MS interfaces and common detectors.Therefore, the comprehensive reason is best captured by “All of the above.”Verification / Alternative check:Method translations between gases show helium and hydrogen enable faster analysis than nitrogen; helium remains preferred where hydrogen’s flammability is a concern.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Ignoring safety protocols for hydrogen; while it can outperform helium in speed, flammability demands strict controls.
Final Answer:All of the above
Discussion & Comments