Difficulty: Hard
Correct Answer: 3
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question tests advanced simplification using trigonometric identities and algebraic factorization. The given condition involves sec^2 θ and tan^2 θ, which are connected by the fundamental identity:
sec^2 θ = 1 + tan^2 θ.
Rather than trying to find θ, you can treat tan^2 θ as a variable and solve for it using the given equation. Then compute sec^2 θ from the identity. The target expression sec^4 θ − tan^4 θ is a difference of fourth powers, which can be simplified efficiently using:
A^4 − B^4 = (A^2 − B^2)(A^2 + B^2).
Here, A^2 corresponds to sec^2 θ and B^2 corresponds to tan^2 θ. This approach avoids any angle calculation and stays purely algebraic. It is a common “hard” aptitude pattern because it requires combining identity knowledge with the correct factorization to get a simple exact result.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Let t = tan^2 θ. Then sec^2 θ = 1 + t. Substitute into the given:
(1 + t) + t = 3 ⇒ 1 + 2t = 3 ⇒ t = 1.
So tan^2 θ = 1 and sec^2 θ = 2. Now simplify:
sec^4 θ − tan^4 θ = (sec^2 θ − tan^2 θ)(sec^2 θ + tan^2 θ).
Compute both factors using the known values.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Let t = tan^2 θ.
2) Then sec^2 θ = 1 + t.
3) Substitute into the given equation:
sec^2 θ + tan^2 θ = 3
(1 + t) + t = 3
4) Solve for t:
1 + 2t = 3 ⇒ 2t = 2 ⇒ t = 1
5) So:
tan^2 θ = 1 and sec^2 θ = 1 + 1 = 2
6) Use factorization:
sec^4 θ − tan^4 θ = (sec^2 θ − tan^2 θ)(sec^2 θ + tan^2 θ)
7) Compute each factor:
sec^2 θ − tan^2 θ = 2 − 1 = 1
sec^2 θ + tan^2 θ = 3 (given)
8) Multiply:
1*3 = 3
Verification / Alternative check:
From tan^2 θ = 1, tan θ = 1 for an acute angle implies θ = 45°. Then sec^2 θ = 1 + tan^2 θ = 2, consistent with the given sum 2 + 1 = 3. Now sec^4 θ − tan^4 θ = 2^2 − 1^2 = 4 − 1 = 3, matching the factorization result exactly.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
• 1: would occur if you mistakenly used sec^2 θ − tan^2 θ alone and ignored the sum factor.
• √3 or 1/√3: unnecessary surds; the algebra forces an integer here.
• 0: would require sec^2 θ = tan^2 θ, which would contradict sec^2 θ = 1 + tan^2 θ.
Common Pitfalls:
• Forgetting sec^2 θ = 1 + tan^2 θ.
• Simplifying sec^4 − tan^4 as (sec^2 − tan^2)^2 (wrong).
• Not using the given value of sec^2 θ + tan^2 θ = 3 when factorizing.
Final Answer:
3
Discussion & Comments