Plane pin-jointed frames — condition for imperfection: A framed structure (simple, plane, pin-jointed) is considered imperfect if the number of members m is __________ (2j − 3), where j is the number of joints.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: either (b) or (c)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
For plane pin-jointed trusses, the simple test m = 2j − 3 helps classify whether a frame is statically determinate (perfect), unstable (deficient), or redundant (excess). This criterion is widely used in structural analysis as a quick screening before detailed calculations.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Plane, pin-jointed frame.
  • No special geometric constraints (no internal mechanisms) beyond simple connections.
  • m = number of members; j = number of joints.


Concept / Approach:
A simple (perfect) truss satisfies m = 2j − 3. If m < 2j − 3, the truss is deficient in members (mechanism/unstable). If m > 2j − 3, it is redundant and therefore imperfect from a purely statical-determinacy standpoint.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Perfect frame condition: m = 2j − 3.Deficient (unstable): m < 2j − 3.Redundant (statically indeterminate): m > 2j − 3.Imperfect = not perfect ⇒ m ≠ 2j − 3 ⇒ either less than or greater than 2j − 3.


Verification / Alternative check:
Classical examples: A triangular frame (j = 3) with m = 3 is perfect (3 = 2*3 − 3). Removing one member (m = 2) makes it a mechanism (deficient). Adding an extra member (m = 4) introduces redundancy (excess). Both non-equal cases are imperfect.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • equal to: That is the perfect condition, not imperfect.
  • less than: Only one type of imperfection (deficient) but misses redundant case.
  • greater than: Only redundant case; misses deficient case.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Assuming m = 2j − 3 guarantees stability in all geometric layouts; certain special geometries can still be mechanisms.
  • Confusing determinacy (solvability by statics alone) with structural safety or serviceability.


Final Answer:
either (b) or (c)

More Questions from Engineering Mechanics

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion