Fraction Analogy — “1/9 : 1/81 :: 3/13 : ?”. Detect the pattern that maps the first fraction to the second and apply it to 3/13.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 1/169

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Fraction analogies often involve transformations on the numerator, denominator, or both. The pair “1/9 : 1/81” suggests a rule that holds the numerator fixed at 1 while transforming the denominator in a specific way. We must discover that transformation and then apply it to “3/13.”


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The first numerator is 1 and remains 1 in the mapped fraction.
  • The denominator changes from 9 to 81.
  • We seek a consistent transformation that we can apply when the left fraction is 3/13.


Concept / Approach:
Notice 81 = 9^2. A clean rule is: map a/b → 1/b^2 (fixing the numerator at 1 and squaring the denominator). This reproduces 1/9 → 1/81 exactly. Applying the same rule to 3/13 gives 1/13^2 = 1/169.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify pattern: denominator squared while numerator becomes 1 (a/b → 1/b^2).Apply to 3/13: denominator 13 → 13^2 = 169; numerator resets to 1.Result: 1/169.


Verification / Alternative check:
Alternative interpretations like dividing by 9 (1/9 → 1/81 because (1/9)/9 = 1/81) fail for 3/13 because (3/13)/9 = 3/117 (not among standard simplest forms and generally not offered). The denominator-square rule works perfectly and yields an offered option.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

1/125, 1/120, 1/127 — denominators do not equal 13^2; arbitrary.3/117 — would fit a “divide by 9” rule, but that rule is not suggested by the given pair in a standard way for fractions; the canonical pattern is denominator squared with numerator set to 1.


Common Pitfalls:
Overfitting a single arithmetic tweak (like division by a constant) when a clean structural transformation (denominator squared) more directly explains the example.


Final Answer:
1/169

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion