Bonding in solids and directionality: Which type of interatomic bonding is strongly directional in crystalline solids, leading to specific bond angles and directional properties?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Covalent bonding

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The nature of chemical bonding affects mechanical, electronic, and thermal properties of solids. Directionality refers to a bond's preference for particular angles and orientations in space, which strongly influences crystal structure and anisotropy.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Comparison among common bonding types: ionic, metallic, covalent, and Van der Waals.
  • Crystalline solid contexts, not molecular gases.
  • Focus on angular preferences and spatial orientation.


Concept / Approach:
Covalent bonds arise from shared electron pairs between atoms and favor discrete directional orbitals (e.g., sp^3 tetrahedral in diamond), imposing strict bond angles and directional rigidity. Ionic and metallic bonds are largely non-directional due to electrostatic attractions or delocalized electron clouds, while Van der Waals forces are weak and non-directional dispersion interactions.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify bonding types and assess directionality.Covalent: strong directionality from orbital hybridization (e.g., sp, sp^2, sp^3).Ionic/metallic: bond strength arises from omnidirectional fields or electron seas.Therefore, select 'Covalent bonding'.


Verification / Alternative check:
Materials with covalent networks (diamond, silicon) exhibit high anisotropy and specific bond angles; metals with metallic bonding tend to have close-packed structures with slip systems reflecting non-directionality.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Van der Waals: weak, non-directional interactions.

Ionic: electrostatic, largely isotropic in solids.

Metallic: delocalized electrons lead to non-directional bonding and ductility.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Conflating molecular geometry (directional) with bulk crystalline packing in non-covalent solids.
  • Assuming hydrogen bonding here; it is not one of the listed fundamental solid-state bonds.


Final Answer:
Covalent bonding

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion