C data types and ranges: evaluate the claim “Range of float is from -2.25e+308 to +2.25e+308.” Assume a typical C implementation targeting IEEE-754 formats unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
In the C language, floating-point ranges depend on the underlying representation, which on most modern systems follows IEEE-754. Knowing the typical limits for float (single precision), double (double precision), and long double helps you choose the right type without overflow or underflow surprises. This question tests whether a quoted range matches the usual capacity of a float.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Typical C implementation using IEEE-754 formats.
  • float is usually 32-bit single precision; double is usually 64-bit double precision.
  • We evaluate the statement “float range is about ±2.25e+308”.


Concept / Approach:
IEEE-754 single precision (float) has approximately 7 decimal digits of precision and a maximum finite magnitude near 3.4e+38. IEEE-754 double precision (double) has roughly 15–16 digits and a maximum finite magnitude near 1.7e+308. Therefore, a bound as high as 2.25e+308 cannot describe float; it is closer to, but still not exactly, the double limit.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify target type in the claim: float.Recall typical float max magnitude: about 3.4e+38.Compare with claimed 2.25e+308: vastly larger, off by ~270 orders of magnitude.Conclude the statement does not match float; it resembles double's order of magnitude (about 1.7e+308), but even then the number 2.25e+308 is not the standard double limit.


Verification / Alternative check:
On a standard system, printing FLT_MAX and DBL_MAX from will show approximately 3.402823e+38 and 1.797693e+308, respectively, confirming the reasoning.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Correct: wrong because float cannot reach e+308.Depends only on the compiler optimizations: optimization has nothing to do with fundamental representation limits.True on 16-bit vs 32-bit: historical memory models do not turn float into e+308.Applies only to long double: some long double formats exceed double, but the claim explicitly names float.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing float with double, or assuming all platforms use identical sizes while ignoring standard macros like FLT_MAX and DBL_MAX.


Final Answer:
Incorrect.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion