Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Drop the foreign key constraint that references the parent table before removing the column
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question addresses the proper procedure for dropping a column that participates in a foreign key relationship. Foreign key constraints enforce referential integrity between parent and child tables. Because of this enforcement, the database will not allow you to drop a column that is part of an active foreign key constraint. The correct procedure requires dealing with the constraint first and then altering the table structure.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Foreign key constraints ensure that values in the child table match existing values in the parent table or are null when allowed. Because the constraint depends on the existence of the foreign key column, the database requires that the constraint be removed or modified before the column itself can be dropped. This is typically done with an ALTER TABLE statement that drops the foreign key constraint by name. Only after the constraint is removed can the column be safely dropped without violating the system catalog or referential integrity rules.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recognize that the column in question is part of a foreign key constraint in the child table.Step 2: Recall that database systems prevent dropping columns that are referenced by active constraints.Step 3: Determine that the appropriate action is to drop or disable the foreign key constraint first.Step 4: Use a suitable ALTER TABLE statement to drop the foreign key constraint that references the parent table.Step 5: After the constraint is removed, issue a separate ALTER TABLE command to drop the column itself.
Verification / Alternative check:
In most relational DBMS products such as Oracle, SQL Server, and PostgreSQL, attempting to drop a column that is part of a foreign key without removing the constraint will trigger an error indicating that the column is referenced by a constraint. Documentation for these systems explicitly describes the need to drop or disable the constraint first. This consistent behavior across products verifies that the correct first step is to drop the foreign key constraint, not the primary key or the entire table.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Dropping the primary key on the parent table is unnecessary and would disrupt other relationships that depend on that primary key. Dropping the entire table that contains the foreign key might remove the column, but it is excessive and normally undesirable, as it destroys all data in the child table. Performing all of the steps as suggested in the option about doing everything in sequence is incorrect and wasteful. The statement that you should simply rename the column because dropping is never allowed is also false, because dropping columns is allowed when constraints are handled correctly.
Common Pitfalls:
A common pitfall is forgetting that schema changes must respect existing constraints and indexes. Developers sometimes attempt to drop or alter columns without checking dependencies, leading to errors or unintended side effects. To avoid such issues, always list constraints on the table first, then plan the sequence of operations. Dropping the foreign key constraint before dropping the column is a standard and safe approach that aligns with best practices in schema evolution.
Final Answer:
The correct first step is to drop the foreign key constraint that references the parent table before removing the column.
Discussion & Comments