Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Chemical method (hydrometallurgical leaching and recovery)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Nuclear fuel begins as ores from which uranium must be extracted economically and safely. Recognizing the dominant industrial pathway helps distinguish practical flowsheets from purely academic alternatives.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The primary industrial route is hydrometallurgy: chemical leaching (acidic or alkaline) to dissolve uranium selectively, followed by solid–liquid separation and chemical recovery (e.g., solvent extraction, ion exchange, or precipitation). Physical beneficiation alone rarely suffices for low-grade ores, while direct pyrometallurgy to metallic uranium from ore is not the initial, mainstream approach.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Crush and grind ore to liberate minerals.Leach uranium with sulfuric acid or carbonate systems (depending on gangue).Separate solids from pregnant solution.Recover uranium chemically (e.g., SX/IX) and precipitate as a concentrate.Dry and package yellowcake for conversion/enrichment.
Verification / Alternative check:
Industry case studies and standards describe hydrometallurgical leach plants as the backbone of uranium production, with in-situ recovery (ISR) being a variant that is likewise chemical in nature.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Pyrometallurgy directly to metal: not the first industrial step from ore.Physical beneficiation only: insufficient for most uranium ores.Electrometallurgy first: niche, not the mainstream starting point.Fermentation without chemicals: not an established uranium practice.
Common Pitfalls:
Equating “beneficiation” with “extraction” in low-grade ores.Ignoring the strong role of solution chemistry in uranium recovery.
Final Answer:
Chemical method (hydrometallurgical leaching and recovery)
Discussion & Comments