In this error spotting question, decide whether there is any grammatical error in the sentence about not sacrificing high standards to make students happy.

Introduction / Context:
This error spotting question asks you to determine whether a sentence about school faculty and administration contains any grammatical error. The sentence discusses the idea that schools should not sacrifice high standards and regulations just to make students temporarily happy. Sometimes exam questions include sentences that are fully correct to test whether candidates can confidently recognise a no error situation instead of forcing an unnecessary correction.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Part 1: Our school’s faculty and administration should not
• Part 2: sacrifice high standards and regulations in order
• Part 3: to make students temporarily happy.
• Part 4: No error
• The sentence is intended to express a clear policy opinion in correct formal English.

Concept / Approach:
We analyse each part for subject verb agreement, prepositions, infinitive structures, and word order. The subject our school’s faculty and administration is a compound subject joined by and, which correctly takes the auxiliary should not. The verb phrase sacrifice high standards and regulations in order to make is properly constructed, with in order followed by the infinitive to make. The adverb temporarily correctly modifies happy. No part of the sentence breaks standard grammar rules or appears awkward in formal written English, so the correct choice is that there is no error.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Check subject verb agreement in part 1: faculty and administration is a combined subject, so should not sacrifice is correct. Step 2: Examine part 2 to see whether sacrifice high standards and regulations in order is a normal structure; it is, as in order typically introduces purpose. Step 3: Look at part 3, to make students temporarily happy, and confirm that the infinitive to make expresses purpose and that the adverb temporarily correctly modifies happy. Step 4: Ensure that punctuation and word order do not create ambiguity or awkwardness. Step 5: Conclude that all parts are grammatically correct, so the correct answer is No error.

Verification / Alternative check:
Compare the sentence with typical policy statements found in educational reports: Schools should not sacrifice academic standards to please students or Institutions must not lower regulations simply to keep students satisfied. The structure used here follows similar patterns. There is a clear subject, a negative modal verb phrase, and a purpose clause introduced by in order to. Since no change is necessary to improve correctness or clarity, we can confidently mark part 4 as the correct choice.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Part 1 uses a possessive phrase our school’s faculty and administration correctly and matches it with the modal auxiliary should not.

Part 2 uses the direct object high standards and regulations correctly after sacrifice and leads into the purpose clause smoothly.

Part 3 accurately expresses the purpose of the potential sacrifice with the infinitive to make and additional detail temporarily happy.

Common Pitfalls:
Some candidates feel compelled to find an error in every sentence and may try to change perfectly acceptable phrases like in order to or high standards and regulations. It is important to remember that no error is often a valid answer. A useful strategy is to check whether any proposed change would clearly improve grammatical correctness; if you cannot justify a change, it is safer to select No error.

Final Answer:
The sentence has no grammatical error; the correct choice is part 4, No error.